Back to Blog & Insights

Career Development

Make Sponsorship Visible When Work Is Distributed

Distributed teams cannot rely on informal visibility. Managers can build a concrete sponsorship loop that connects stretch work, evidence, senior advocacy and follow-through.

By WWA Editorial Team 4 min read
Manager and remote project lead discussing a cross-functional assignment during a video meeting

A remote project lead has delivered complex work, coordinated colleagues across functions and shown that she is ready for broader responsibility. Her manager could suggest that she network more or find a mentor. Instead, the manager defines a cross-functional assignment with real stakes: lead the operating plan for a product launch involving sales, finance and customer support. The manager records the evidence of readiness, identifies an executive with influence across those teams and asks that leader to advocate for her access to the assignment—not simply give her advice.

That sequence turns sponsorship from a private relationship into a visible business process. Opportunity, advocacy and follow-through are explicit. This matters when work is distributed because proximity can otherwise shape who is remembered, trusted and invited into consequential work. McKinsey & Company and LeanIn.Org reported in their 2024 study of more than 15,000 employees and over 280 HR leaders that mostly remote women experienced weaker sponsorship and promotion outcomes. The study recommended fair access to stretch opportunities.

Start with work that expands scope

A stretch assignment should build experience the employee cannot gain by doing more of her current job. Managers can look for work that crosses functions, introduces a larger customer or operational problem, requires decisions with competing priorities, or creates exposure to leaders beyond the employee’s usual group.

The assignment must also be real. Asking someone to take notes for a senior committee provides exposure without authority. A stronger opportunity gives her a defined outcome, decision rights and named partners. For example, she might own the recommendation presented to the committee, coordinate the analysis and answer questions about trade-offs. Center for Creative Leadership research connects broad organizational perspective with advancement, supporting cross-functional exposure rather than advice alone.

Match the sponsor’s influence to the opening

The right sponsor is not necessarily the most senior person available. It is someone whose credibility and relationships can unlock the specific opportunity. If the assignment depends on cooperation from regional sales leaders, a sponsor with influence in that network may be more useful than an executive in an unrelated function.

The manager’s request should be concrete: “Her delivery on the last two cross-team projects shows that she can manage dependencies and resolve disagreements. Will you advocate for her to lead the launch plan and reinforce her authority with the functional leads?” This asks the sponsor to use influence while giving that advocacy an evidence base. It also reduces reliance on familiarity, chemistry or time spent in the same office.

Make contribution observable

Visibility should come from the work, not from requiring remote employees to promote themselves constantly. Before the assignment begins, the manager, sponsor and employee should agree on outcomes and the moments when her contribution will be seen. Those moments might include presenting a recommendation, leading a decision meeting or sending a concise progress update under her own name.

Managers should preserve evidence as the work unfolds: decisions made, obstacles resolved, partners aligned and results delivered. The sponsor can then cite specific contributions when advocating for the next opportunity. This reflects the Center for Creative Leadership’s framing of sponsorship, challenging assignments and exposure as organizational-system issues rather than responsibilities left solely to individual employees.

Close and review the loop

Sponsorship is incomplete if access produces work but no career follow-through. At the end of the assignment, the manager should review what capability was demonstrated, what feedback matters and which next role or responsibility now fits. The sponsor should know the result and decide where continued advocacy is warranted.

Managers should also examine the distribution of access. A quarterly review can compare who received stretch assignments, sponsor advocacy and senior exposure across locations, work arrangements and functions. The useful question is not whether everyone received identical opportunities. It is whether readiness was assessed with consistent evidence and whether valuable assignments repeatedly flowed through the same office-based networks.

A visible sponsorship loop does not remove managerial judgment. It makes that judgment easier to examine and improve. When stretch work, advocacy, evidence and follow-through connect, distributed employees do not have to depend on being nearby when opportunity is discussed.

Sources