Back to Blog & Insights

Business Growth

Build a Customer Advisory Group Around a Real Decision

A useful customer advisory group is built around a recurring strategic decision. Give members a focused question, keep management accountable for the choice and report what their input changed.

By WWA Editorial Team 3 min read
B2B leaders and customers discussing service priorities around a conference table

Your company has three plausible service investments, limited capacity and conflicting customer requests. A customer advisory group may help, but only if its purpose is sharper than “hearing from customers.” Without a real decision to inform, the meeting can drift into a sales presentation, a loyalty event or a collection of interesting comments that nobody uses.

Start with a recurring strategic choice. It might be which service problem deserves the next investment, which workflow creates the most friction or which capability should enter the development pipeline. The question should matter to customers, require judgment and return often enough to justify a standing group. A Journal of Marketing study of 329 B2B firms over nine years found that customer presence in governance can add customer knowledge, but the benefit depends on uncertainty and organizational fit rather than participation alone.

Frame the choice before inviting anyone

Consider a clearly illustrative reusable-packaging supplier. Its customers report several service problems: containers are sometimes difficult to track, return scheduling takes staff time and cleaning documentation can be cumbersome. Management must decide which problem to investigate for its next service initiative. The advisory group is not asked to approve a finished product or select from a disguised sales menu. It is asked to clarify where operational friction is most consequential, what customers do today and what trade-offs they face.

That boundary matters. Customers.com distinguishes strategy-building customer dialogue from executive briefings and promotional relationship events. If most of the agenda explains the supplier’s achievements, the group is functioning as an audience. Send essential context beforehand, keep presentations short and devote the conversation to the defined decision.

Recruit for relevance, not prestige

Invite customers who encounter the decision from different useful positions. For the packaging supplier, that could include customers with centralized and distributed operations, frequent and occasional returns, mature tracking processes and manual ones. Participants might represent procurement, operations or sustainability roles when those perspectives directly affect the service choice. Variety should illuminate the question, not create a large representative sample.

An advisory group is not a substitute for broader research. Interviews, service data, win-loss analysis or surveys may be better for estimating how widespread a problem is. The group’s strength is active discussion: members can compare workflows, challenge assumptions and explain consequences. The Italian Journal of Marketing’s analysis of customer co-creation describes it as active collaboration in innovation while treating customer participation and value creation as distinct themes. Participation itself does not guarantee a valuable decision.

Prepare a conversation management can use

Give members a concise brief: the decision, what is already known, what remains uncertain and which constraints are real. Ask for specific accounts of current work rather than predictions about hypothetical purchases. For example: Where does return scheduling break down? Who handles the exception? What happens next? Then test trade-offs across the competing problems instead of asking members to endorse every possible improvement.

Management must retain responsibility. Duke University’s advisory-board guidance emphasizes intentional formation, governance, participation support and a clear line between advisory influence and management authority. Tell members who will decide, when the choice will be made and what other evidence will be considered. Avoid implying that consensus binds the company.

Close the loop after the meeting. Report what management learned, what it decided to investigate, what it declined and why. The packaging supplier might conclude that tracking deserves deeper validation while cleaning documentation requires a smaller process fix. That is not a promised outcome; it shows the required discipline. Members should be able to see how their input affected the decision without being treated as owners of it. A group built this way earns its next meeting because it informs a real choice, not because the calendar says it should.

Sources